{
  "entries": [
    {
      "canonical_definition": "The study of converting dispersed evidence into portfolios of search actions.",
      "canonical_label": "Distributed Discovery",
      "formulations": [
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program",
            "start-here"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-001",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0001"
          ],
          "community": "or-ms",
          "community_formulation": "collective search under dispersed information",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-001"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "project working definition",
          "paper_owners": [
            "foundations"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "new field",
            "first definition"
          ],
          "relation_type": "exact-equivalent",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "search allocation",
            "organization design"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-000"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-001",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0001"
          ],
          "community": "economics-agt",
          "community_formulation": "information and incentive design for portfolio search",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-009"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "neighbor rather than established synonym",
          "paper_owners": [
            "foundations"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "successor to search theory",
            "general implementation theory"
          ],
          "relation_type": "standard-literature-neighbor",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "team decision",
            "information design"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-000"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-001",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0001"
          ],
          "community": "multi-agent-ai",
          "community_formulation": "coordinating agent evidence into diverse task actions",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-002"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "software-agent mapping only",
          "paper_owners": [
            "foundations"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "universal agent benchmark",
            "model quality ranking"
          ],
          "relation_type": "approximate-restatement",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "multi-agent planning",
            "agent evaluation"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-000",
            "DD-010"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "start-here"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-001",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0001"
          ],
          "community": "practitioner",
          "community_formulation": "turn what the group knows into a deliberate portfolio of attempts",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-001"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "conceptual translation not deployment evidence",
          "paper_owners": [
            "foundations"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "proven operating system",
            "adopted practice"
          ],
          "relation_type": "practitioner-formulation",
          "standard_literature_terms": [],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-000"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "object_id": "TR-001"
    },
    {
      "canonical_definition": "The information architecture, action protocol, and reward rule that govern collective discovery.",
      "canonical_label": "discovery architecture",
      "formulations": [
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program",
            "start-here"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-002",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0001"
          ],
          "community": "or-ms",
          "community_formulation": "an information-to-action allocation system",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-001"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "includes declared information action and reward rules",
          "paper_owners": [
            "foundations"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "universal organization design"
          ],
          "relation_type": "exact-equivalent",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "system design",
            "allocation policy"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-000"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-002",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0001"
          ],
          "community": "economics-agt",
          "community_formulation": "an information structure paired with a game or team decision rule",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-009",
            "LIT-010"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "not identical to either object alone",
          "paper_owners": [
            "foundations"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "standard mechanism-design object"
          ],
          "relation_type": "standard-literature-neighbor",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "information structure",
            "mechanism"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-000",
            "DD-002"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-002",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0001"
          ],
          "community": "multi-agent-ai",
          "community_formulation": "an agent topology plus evidence action and reward interfaces",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-002"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "analogy with declared task semantics",
          "paper_owners": [
            "foundations"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "agent operating standard"
          ],
          "relation_type": "analogy",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "agent architecture",
            "coordination protocol"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-000",
            "DD-010"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "start-here"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-002",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0001"
          ],
          "community": "practitioner",
          "community_formulation": "who sees what who does what and how success is credited",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-001"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "simplified formulation",
          "paper_owners": [
            "foundations"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "complete management recipe"
          ],
          "relation_type": "practitioner-formulation",
          "standard_literature_terms": [],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-000"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "object_id": "TR-002"
    },
    {
      "canonical_definition": "Better pooled ranking can coexist with worse group discovery when one shared answer compresses the action portfolio.",
      "canonical_label": "Shared Discovery Paradox",
      "formulations": [
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program",
            "start-here",
            "publication-shared-discovery-paradox"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-003",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0005"
          ],
          "community": "or-ms",
          "community_formulation": "information improvement with action-allocation loss",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-001"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "atomic pinned model and protocol comparison",
          "paper_owners": [
            "shared-discovery-paradox"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "information generally harms discovery"
          ],
          "relation_type": "approximate-restatement",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "search allocation",
            "portfolio coverage"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-000"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program",
            "start-here"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-003",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0005",
            "DD-C-0016"
          ],
          "community": "economics-agt",
          "community_formulation": "a decentralized information-action separation under changed protocol",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-009"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "not a violation of centralized Blackwell monotonicity",
          "paper_owners": [
            "shared-discovery-paradox"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "Blackwell reversal for a fixed feasible set"
          ],
          "relation_type": "standard-literature-neighbor",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "team decision",
            "information comparison"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-000"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "start-here"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-003",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0005"
          ],
          "community": "multi-agent-ai",
          "community_formulation": "shared context can collapse an agent ensemble onto one action",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-012"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "task analogy not evaluated agent evidence",
          "paper_owners": [
            "shared-discovery-paradox"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "LLMs are proven to collapse"
          ],
          "relation_type": "analogy",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "ensemble collapse",
            "correlated agents"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-000",
            "DD-010"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "start-here"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-003",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0005"
          ],
          "community": "practitioner",
          "community_formulation": "a better shared answer can send everyone to the same wrong place",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-003"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "model illustration not field evidence",
          "paper_owners": [
            "shared-discovery-paradox"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "sharing is bad"
          ],
          "relation_type": "practitioner-formulation",
          "standard_literature_terms": [],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-000"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "object_id": "TR-003"
    },
    {
      "canonical_definition": "Information quality and the allocation of feasible actions are distinct inputs to discovery value.",
      "canonical_label": "information/action separation",
      "formulations": [
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program",
            "start-here"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-004",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0002",
            "DD-C-0016"
          ],
          "community": "or-ms",
          "community_formulation": "separate information state from action-allocation policy",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-009"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "accounting and emulation scope only",
          "paper_owners": [
            "foundations"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "general separation theorem"
          ],
          "relation_type": "exact-equivalent",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "policy emulation",
            "feasible set"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-000"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-004",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0002",
            "DD-C-0016"
          ],
          "community": "economics-agt",
          "community_formulation": "distinguish experiment comparison from decentralized implementation",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-009",
            "LIT-010"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "no general decentralized separation theorem",
          "paper_owners": [
            "foundations"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "new Blackwell theorem"
          ],
          "relation_type": "standard-literature-neighbor",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "Blackwell order",
            "team decision"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-000",
            "DD-002"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-004",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0002"
          ],
          "community": "multi-agent-ai",
          "community_formulation": "distinguish better shared context from better joint action coverage",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-002"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "formal model mapping required",
          "paper_owners": [
            "foundations"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "context sharing always reduces coverage"
          ],
          "relation_type": "approximate-restatement",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "coordination",
            "task allocation"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-000",
            "DD-010"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "start-here"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-004",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0002"
          ],
          "community": "practitioner",
          "community_formulation": "knowing the same thing does not decide who should try what",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-001"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "explanatory shorthand",
          "paper_owners": [
            "foundations"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "proof for all organizations"
          ],
          "relation_type": "practitioner-formulation",
          "standard_literature_terms": [],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-000"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "object_id": "TR-004"
    },
    {
      "canonical_definition": "Discovery retained by private attempts that remain outside a pooled one-action block.",
      "canonical_label": "independent rescue",
      "formulations": [
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program",
            "publication-information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-005",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0092",
            "DD-C-0097"
          ],
          "community": "or-ms",
          "community_formulation": "residual independent coverage outside the pooled block",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-002"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "registered one-hit rescue protocol",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "general value of independence"
          ],
          "relation_type": "exact-equivalent",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "residual coverage",
            "marginal search"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-020",
            "DD-021"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "publication-information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-005",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0092",
            "DD-C-0097"
          ],
          "community": "economics-agt",
          "community_formulation": "outside option value of unpooled search attempts",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-011"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "mechanical coverage term not a payoff theorem",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "option value theorem"
          ],
          "relation_type": "approximate-restatement",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "outside option",
            "marginal contribution"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-020",
            "DD-021"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-005",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0092"
          ],
          "community": "multi-agent-ai",
          "community_formulation": "agents kept on independent task attempts can recover pooled misses",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-012"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "unevaluated software-agent analogy",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "measured agent recovery"
          ],
          "relation_type": "analogy",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "ensemble diversity",
            "fallback policy"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-020",
            "DD-010"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "start-here"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-005",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0092"
          ],
          "community": "practitioner",
          "community_formulation": "keep some independent attempts available to catch what the shared answer misses",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-003"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "model-based design language",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "proven operating advice"
          ],
          "relation_type": "practitioner-formulation",
          "standard_literature_terms": [],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-020"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "object_id": "TR-005"
    },
    {
      "canonical_definition": "The pooled posterior discovery value as the number of distinct coordinated actions varies.",
      "canonical_label": "action-budget discovery profile",
      "formulations": [
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program",
            "publication-information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-006",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0089",
            "DD-C-0091"
          ],
          "community": "or-ms",
          "community_formulation": "cardinality-constrained posterior coverage frontier",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-009"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "declared finite channel and top-L planner",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "universal information frontier"
          ],
          "relation_type": "exact-equivalent",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "coverage frontier",
            "cardinality budget"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-019"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "publication-information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-006",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0089"
          ],
          "community": "economics-agt",
          "community_formulation": "value of an experiment under a portfolio-action decision problem",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-009"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "specialized discovery payoff and centralized authority",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "new information order"
          ],
          "relation_type": "standard-literature-neighbor",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "statistical experiment",
            "team decision"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-019"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-006",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0089"
          ],
          "community": "multi-agent-ai",
          "community_formulation": "best exact task coverage available with L coordinated agent actions",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-002"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "theoretical oracle baseline not observed agents",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "agent performance curve"
          ],
          "relation_type": "analogy",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "task allocation",
            "oracle baseline"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-019",
            "DD-010"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "start-here"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-006",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0089"
          ],
          "community": "practitioner",
          "community_formulation": "how much the group can cover with one two or more distinct attempts",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-001"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "model frontier under centralized coordination",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "forecast of real outcomes"
          ],
          "relation_type": "practitioner-formulation",
          "standard_literature_terms": [],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-019"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "object_id": "TR-006"
    },
    {
      "canonical_definition": "The smallest pooled action budget that weakly recovers a named comparison baseline.",
      "canonical_label": "recovery budget",
      "formulations": [
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program",
            "publication-information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-007",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0008",
            "DD-C-0091",
            "DD-C-0102"
          ],
          "community": "or-ms",
          "community_formulation": "minimum resource budget meeting a benchmark value",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-009"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "baseline and authority must be named",
          "paper_owners": [
            "shared-discovery-paradox",
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "intrinsic recovery constant"
          ],
          "relation_type": "exact-equivalent",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "resource augmentation",
            "threshold budget"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-000",
            "DD-019",
            "DD-021"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "publication-information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-007",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0091",
            "DD-C-0102"
          ],
          "community": "economics-agt",
          "community_formulation": "smallest action capacity restoring a declared outside option",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-010"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "centralized comparator unless otherwise stated",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "equilibrium implementation cost"
          ],
          "relation_type": "approximate-restatement",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "outside option",
            "implementation gap"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-019",
            "DD-021"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-007",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0091"
          ],
          "community": "multi-agent-ai",
          "community_formulation": "number of distinct coordinated agent actions needed to match a private baseline",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-002"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "exact task baseline not evaluated agent evidence",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "measured recovery capacity"
          ],
          "relation_type": "analogy",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "oracle budget",
            "coordination gap"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-019",
            "DD-010"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "start-here"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-007",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0008"
          ],
          "community": "practitioner",
          "community_formulation": "how many different attempts are needed to win back what pooling lost",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-001"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "benchmark-specific model quantity",
          "paper_owners": [
            "shared-discovery-paradox"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "universal staffing rule"
          ],
          "relation_type": "practitioner-formulation",
          "standard_literature_terms": [],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-000"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "object_id": "TR-007"
    },
    {
      "canonical_definition": "Equal-share incentives can induce excessive acquisition from a shared source in the declared finite source-choice game.",
      "canonical_label": "Common-Source Trap",
      "formulations": [
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program",
            "publication-common-source-trap"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-008",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0057",
            "DD-C-0058"
          ],
          "community": "or-ms",
          "community_formulation": "endogenous source concentration under shared discovery credit",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-002"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "homogeneous one-shot equal-prize model",
          "paper_owners": [
            "common-source-trap"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "all shared sources cause failure"
          ],
          "relation_type": "approximate-restatement",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "source selection",
            "correlated search"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-008B"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "publication-common-source-trap"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-008",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0057",
            "DD-C-0058"
          ],
          "community": "economics-agt",
          "community_formulation": "strategic over-acquisition of correlated information",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-013"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "static declared payoff game",
          "paper_owners": [
            "common-source-trap"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "general information-acquisition theorem"
          ],
          "relation_type": "standard-literature-neighbor",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "information acquisition",
            "public good"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-008B"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-008",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0057"
          ],
          "community": "multi-agent-ai",
          "community_formulation": "multiple agents choose evidence routes that share one latent source",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-012"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "unevaluated agent-system analogy",
          "paper_owners": [
            "common-source-trap"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "LLM source trap observed"
          ],
          "relation_type": "analogy",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "correlated retrieval",
            "source diversity"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-008B",
            "DD-010"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "start-here"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-008",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0057"
          ],
          "community": "practitioner",
          "community_formulation": "many reports can still be one source in disguise",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-003"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "model insight not provenance measurement",
          "paper_owners": [
            "common-source-trap"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "source independence diagnosis"
          ],
          "relation_type": "practitioner-formulation",
          "standard_literature_terms": [],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-008B"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "object_id": "TR-008"
    },
    {
      "canonical_definition": "In the registered role class, one shared-clue reader maximizes discovery while additional readers duplicate shared-signal action.",
      "canonical_label": "Incentive to Ignore / One-Reader theorem",
      "formulations": [
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program",
            "start-here",
            "publication-incentive-to-ignore"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-009",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0059",
            "DD-C-0060"
          ],
          "community": "or-ms",
          "community_formulation": "optimal audience size under coverage loss",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-011"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "registered evidence-responsive role class",
          "paper_owners": [
            "incentive-to-ignore"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "one reader is always optimal"
          ],
          "relation_type": "approximate-restatement",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "audience design",
            "information allocation"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-012",
            "DD-013"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "publication-incentive-to-ignore"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-009",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0059",
            "DD-C-0062"
          ],
          "community": "economics-agt",
          "community_formulation": "welfare effect of selective public-information access",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-011"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "mechanical coverage and declared incentives",
          "paper_owners": [
            "incentive-to-ignore"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "general anti-public-information theorem"
          ],
          "relation_type": "standard-literature-neighbor",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "public information",
            "audience design"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-012",
            "DD-013"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-009",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0059"
          ],
          "community": "multi-agent-ai",
          "community_formulation": "route a shared clue to one acting agent while others retain independent tasks",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-012"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "task analogy not agent evaluation",
          "paper_owners": [
            "incentive-to-ignore"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "optimal agent context policy"
          ],
          "relation_type": "analogy",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "role specialization",
            "context routing"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-012",
            "DD-010"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "start-here"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-009",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0059"
          ],
          "community": "practitioner",
          "community_formulation": "not everyone who can read the same signal should act on it",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-004"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "scope-bound model statement",
          "paper_owners": [
            "incentive-to-ignore"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "hide information from teams"
          ],
          "relation_type": "practitioner-formulation",
          "standard_literature_terms": [],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-012"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "object_id": "TR-009"
    },
    {
      "canonical_definition": "The sign of a sharing step compares pooled error contraction with the independent rescue removed by pooling.",
      "canonical_label": "Information Sharing Frontier",
      "formulations": [
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program",
            "start-here",
            "publication-information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-010",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0097",
            "DD-C-0106",
            "DD-C-0109"
          ],
          "community": "or-ms",
          "community_formulation": "error-contraction versus residual-coverage frontier",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-009",
            "LIT-015"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "registered channels protocols and selection",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "general law of information sharing"
          ],
          "relation_type": "exact-equivalent",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "marginal coverage",
            "portfolio compression"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-021",
            "DD-022"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "publication-information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-010",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0097",
            "DD-C-0106",
            "DD-C-0109"
          ],
          "community": "economics-agt",
          "community_formulation": "aggregation benefit net of decentralized action compression",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-011",
            "LIT-012"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "selected positive result is not every-equilibrium",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "information sharing improves equilibrium generally"
          ],
          "relation_type": "standard-literature-neighbor",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "public information",
            "equilibrium selection"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-021",
            "DD-022"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-010",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0097"
          ],
          "community": "multi-agent-ai",
          "community_formulation": "shared context helps only if better joint inference beats lost task diversity",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-012"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "theoretical mapping without model evaluation",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "measured multi-agent frontier"
          ],
          "relation_type": "analogy",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "agent coordination",
            "ensemble diversity"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-021",
            "DD-010"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "start-here"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-010",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0097"
          ],
          "community": "practitioner",
          "community_formulation": "share when the map improves faster than the portfolio narrows",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-003"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "model-derived formulation",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "universal sharing rule"
          ],
          "relation_type": "practitioner-formulation",
          "standard_literature_terms": [],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-021"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "object_id": "TR-010"
    },
    {
      "canonical_definition": "The minimum number of agents required for an assigned candidate action to produce discovery value.",
      "canonical_label": "minimum viable team",
      "formulations": [
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program",
            "publication-threshold-discovery"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-011",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0071"
          ],
          "community": "or-ms",
          "community_formulation": "threshold team requirement in portfolio allocation",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-014"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "deterministic threshold technology",
          "paper_owners": [
            "threshold-discovery"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "general team-size optimum"
          ],
          "relation_type": "exact-equivalent",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "threshold production",
            "team formation"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-016"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "publication-threshold-discovery"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-011",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0071"
          ],
          "community": "economics-agt",
          "community_formulation": "minimum-participation production threshold",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-014"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "several candidate-specific teams and posterior weights",
          "paper_owners": [
            "threshold-discovery"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "standard public-good result"
          ],
          "relation_type": "standard-literature-neighbor",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "threshold public good",
            "coalition formation"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-016",
            "DD-017"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-011",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0071"
          ],
          "community": "multi-agent-ai",
          "community_formulation": "smallest agent coalition that can execute a task",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-014"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "deterministic task analogy",
          "paper_owners": [
            "threshold-discovery"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "agent-team benchmark result"
          ],
          "relation_type": "analogy",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "coalition task allocation",
            "capability threshold"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-016",
            "DD-010"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "start-here"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-011",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0071"
          ],
          "community": "practitioner",
          "community_formulation": "form the smallest team that can work then spread remaining teams",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-014"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "model design principle not staffing advice",
          "paper_owners": [
            "threshold-discovery"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "proven hiring rule"
          ],
          "relation_type": "practitioner-formulation",
          "standard_literature_terms": [],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-016"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "object_id": "TR-011"
    },
    {
      "canonical_definition": "A planner uses distinct pooled-posterior actions to recover or exceed a declared decentralized or private baseline.",
      "canonical_label": "centralized recovery",
      "formulations": [
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program",
            "publication-information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-012",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0098",
            "DD-C-0102"
          ],
          "community": "or-ms",
          "community_formulation": "centralized portfolio recovery benchmark",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-009"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "authority and comparison baseline are explicit",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "decentralized implementation"
          ],
          "relation_type": "exact-equivalent",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "planner frontier",
            "resource allocation"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-021"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "publication-information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-012",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0098"
          ],
          "community": "economics-agt",
          "community_formulation": "full-information team benchmark with action assignment",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-009"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "comparator not incentive-compatible mechanism",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "equilibrium recovery theorem"
          ],
          "relation_type": "standard-literature-neighbor",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "team decision",
            "planner optimum"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-021"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-012",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0098"
          ],
          "community": "multi-agent-ai",
          "community_formulation": "oracle task assignment from pooled evidence",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-002"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "theoretical upper comparator",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "deployable agent coordinator"
          ],
          "relation_type": "analogy",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "centralized coordinator",
            "oracle baseline"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-021",
            "DD-010"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "start-here"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-012",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0098"
          ],
          "community": "practitioner",
          "community_formulation": "what a coordinator could recover by assigning different attempts",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-001"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "centralized model benchmark",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "recommended organization design"
          ],
          "relation_type": "practitioner-formulation",
          "standard_literature_terms": [],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-021"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "object_id": "TR-012"
    },
    {
      "canonical_definition": "A positive comparison under one declared equilibrium selection need not hold across the full equilibrium correspondence.",
      "canonical_label": "equilibrium-selection boundary",
      "formulations": [
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program",
            "start-here",
            "publication-information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-013",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0109",
            "DD-C-0110"
          ],
          "community": "or-ms",
          "community_formulation": "implementation performance depends on the selected stable outcome",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-007"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "declared binary equal-share game",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "every-equilibrium improvement"
          ],
          "relation_type": "approximate-restatement",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "equilibrium selection",
            "worst equilibrium"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-022"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "publication-information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-013",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0109",
            "DD-C-0110"
          ],
          "community": "economics-agt",
          "community_formulation": "selected-equilibrium result with an adverse correspondence witness",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-007",
            "LIT-008"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "no refinement or learning selection claimed",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "unique equilibrium",
            "full implementation"
          ],
          "relation_type": "exact-equivalent",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "equilibrium correspondence",
            "refinement"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-022"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-013",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0109"
          ],
          "community": "multi-agent-ai",
          "community_formulation": "one coordination policy can look good while other compatible policies fail",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-012"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "theoretical policy-class analogy",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "observed agent instability"
          ],
          "relation_type": "analogy",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "policy selection",
            "coordination failure"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-022",
            "DD-010"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "start-here"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-013",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0109"
          ],
          "community": "practitioner",
          "community_formulation": "a good outcome is not enough if the rules also permit bad ones",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-008"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "explanation of a model boundary",
          "paper_owners": [
            "information-sharing-frontier"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "all decentralized systems fail"
          ],
          "relation_type": "practitioner-formulation",
          "standard_literature_terms": [],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-022"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "object_id": "TR-013"
    },
    {
      "canonical_definition": "An organizing map across acquisition attention disclosure rewards action duplication and planner-equilibrium gaps.",
      "canonical_label": "strategic implementation spine",
      "formulations": [
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-014",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0013",
            "DD-C-0053",
            "DD-C-0086"
          ],
          "community": "or-ms",
          "community_formulation": "cross-stage implementation map for discovery portfolios",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-006",
            "LIT-008"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "organizing spine not theorem closure",
          "paper_owners": [
            "discovery-institutions"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "unified theory of all studies"
          ],
          "relation_type": "approximate-restatement",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "system design",
            "incentive alignment"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-000",
            "DD-006B",
            "DD-018"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-014",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0013",
            "DD-C-0053",
            "DD-C-0086"
          ],
          "community": "economics-agt",
          "community_formulation": "implementation questions across information acquisition disclosure and local utilities",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-006",
            "LIT-008",
            "LIT-010"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "marginal-contribution closure remains a gate",
          "paper_owners": [
            "discovery-institutions"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "necessary and sufficient characterization"
          ],
          "relation_type": "standard-literature-neighbor",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "mechanism design",
            "utility design"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-006B",
            "DD-018"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-014",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0053",
            "DD-C-0086"
          ],
          "community": "multi-agent-ai",
          "community_formulation": "design the evidence reward and action interfaces that shape agent portfolios",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-008"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "architecture question without agent evaluation",
          "paper_owners": [
            "discovery-institutions"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "validated agent incentive stack"
          ],
          "relation_type": "analogy",
          "standard_literature_terms": [
            "agent incentives",
            "coordination protocol"
          ],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-006B",
            "DD-018",
            "DD-010"
          ]
        },
        {
          "approved_public_surfaces": [
            "program"
          ],
          "canonical_object": "TR-014",
          "claim_ids": [
            "DD-C-0053"
          ],
          "community": "practitioner",
          "community_formulation": "align what gets gathered shared tried and rewarded",
          "literature_coverage": [
            "LIT-001"
          ],
          "mandatory_qualifier": "conceptual map not operating recommendation",
          "paper_owners": [
            "discovery-institutions"
          ],
          "prohibited_phrasing": [
            "proven management system"
          ],
          "relation_type": "practitioner-formulation",
          "standard_literature_terms": [],
          "study_ids": [
            "DD-006B"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "object_id": "TR-014"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": 1
}