Shared Discovery Paradox
One better answer can produce fewer discoveries.
0.383468709731 discovery under one shared answer in the canonical fixture.
See the interactive guideCollective search under dispersed information
How groups turn evidence into portfolios of action.
Better shared information can produce worse collective discovery.
A group can improve its best guess and still waste its attempts by sending everyone to the same place. This project studies how evidence, roles, incentives, and timing shape a portfolio of search actions.
How the system works
A discovery architecture determines more than what a group knows. It shapes who sees evidence, which actions are taken, and what the group learns next.
Key findings
Shared Discovery Paradox
0.383468709731 discovery under one shared answer in the canonical fixture.
See the interactive guideCommon-Source Trap
p(1−p)/N is the exact all-common trap width in the frozen model.
Read the paperTruthful discovery mechanisms
16 strict rows in the registered exact mechanism class.
Open the studyArchitecture Atlas
12 nondominated cells in the bounded synthetic Atlas.
Explore the AtlasKey finding · The Incentive to Ignore
In the frozen shared-versus-private action class, the first reader can improve discovery while duplicate shared-signal use reduces it.
Read the paperKey finding · Threshold Discovery
When candidates open only after a minimum team forms, too little overlap strands effort and too much overlap crowds the portfolio.
Read the paperExplore the work
Browse every completed, active, and planned study.
Change inputs and inspect precomputed model behavior.
Read the long-form arguments and validated artifacts.
Compare search strategies on compatible exact tasks, then try the Treasure Hunt companion.
Share the evidence. Diversify the actions.
When actions require teams, form the smallest viable teams and diversify those teams.