Long-form research
Papers
A lifecycle-aware map of the canonical public anchor, active theorem-family working papers, research notes, and synthesis notes.
Start with three results · See the four-layer hierarchy and paper-admission rule · Open the contextual concordance.
Stable archive
Distributed Discovery Research Compendium v0.1.0
The compendium is preserved as an immutable annotated Git tag, a public GitHub Release with five verified custom assets, and a published Zenodo software record. This archival release does not imply that any included paper was submitted, accepted, peer reviewed, or journal published.
GitHub Release · Zenodo record · Version DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21535005 · Concept DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21535004
Citation convention: use the version DOI for exact v0.1.0 reproduction and the concept DOI for the evolving compendium. Load-bearing claims also retain their paper, claim ID, immutable run ID, and artifact checksum.
Canonical public anchor
The public entry point
Canonical public anchor29 pages
The unique owner-declared canonical public anchor for the atomic paradox. Its upstream citation calls it a working paper; this lifecycle class does not assert journal publication, submission, acceptance, a DOI, or peer review.
Nakajima, Yohei (2026). The Shared Discovery Paradox: How a One-Answer Rule Turns Better Information into Worse Search. Working paper.
Technical details
SHA-256 cb4816cb3a9cdd8db0210ab8981e3729028eb02ba174f2a7300b617807cc1e04
Active theorem-family papers
Flagship working papers
Active working paper21 pages
Explains why many reports can still behave like one source of evidence.
Nakajima, Yohei (2026). The Common-Source Trap. Working paper.
Technical details
Build source
SHA-256 3dc1d06c509121ff1668979344e1b343d559353e0723e9589dac4da61a70794c
Active working paper21 pages
Synthesizes selective attention, audience design, and conditional evidence use.
Nakajima, Yohei (2026). The Incentive to Ignore: Selective Attention and Audience Design in Distributed Discovery. Working paper.
Technical details
Build source
SHA-256 651c91fb68df6b2f1397ca86f3842b7c2fa9c067601957c32401a7f5e95cd24b
Active working paper21 pages
Connects minimum viable teams, equilibrium selection, dynamic attention, and implementable team portfolios.
Nakajima, Yohei (2026). Threshold Discovery: Coordination, Crowding, and Minimum Viable Teams. Working paper.
Technical details
Build source
SHA-256 634e96662989a3fd6efb5fc3e6919883897e60511826e25c6d0176bac4af9249
Active working paper28 pages
Identifies when pooled error contraction beats lost independent rescue, then separates the selected positive result from its equilibrium-selection boundary.
Nakajima, Yohei (2026). When Does Information Sharing Improve Decentralized Discovery? Aggregation, Independent Rescue, and Equilibrium Selection. arXiv:2609.01814 [cs.AI].
Technical details
Build source
SHA-256 8d116b86cdbbc6cda66d65ac72077d29c15b05b86f4dc862ee8ec8e69d8f4ac0
Supporting publications
Research notes and syntheses
Active research note12 pages
Defines the core objects and separates information quality from action allocation.
Nakajima, Yohei (2026). Foundations of Distributed Discovery. Research note.
Technical details
Build source
SHA-256 8875926a52f0b8e722f7ce827c456c4b694f9e981c21c4b15bf2b3c60b83e76b
Active synthesis note14 pages
Connects exact results on roles, disclosure, and correlated sources.
Nakajima, Yohei (2026). Three Results in Distributed Discovery. Synthesis note.
Technical details
Build source
SHA-256 9eb896353b1210706d6108685dde963e02d6a5ebc64af9f9f69c08c01f5ebc96
Active synthesis note4 pages
Synthesizes how evidence, assignment, incentives, and feedback interact.
Nakajima, Yohei (2026). Institutions for Distributed Discovery. Synthesis note.
Technical details
Build source
SHA-256 78606f732f105d79395409dcb9d7224d72aa1e44312ca30ff5719d049afd98a8
Stable citation and dependencies
The site is a living discovery and verification layer, not the sole load-bearing source. The compendium version DOI supplies an immutable repository archive. Per-paper arXiv and DOI fields are shown only when their own metadata records a public source; cite those fields together with the claim or run identifier and checksum where applicable.
Stable citation policy · Release registry · Paper dependency roles
No local project paper is represented as peer reviewed. Information Sharing Frontier has a recorded arXiv v1 preprint; all other local paper status remains in each paper's metadata. The compendium DOI identifies the archival repository release, not a paper-specific publication-status promotion. There are currently no historical lifecycle items. Complete download checksum manifest · Lifecycle registry